Yep, you read that right.
For all it’s worth,
today is “Philosophy Day” according to UNESCO. We had a small celebration at the uni, with the twin book launch and philo debates serving as high lights, glad that catering and festivity frills were sponsored by (the RP reps of? Cesar Montano, is that you? He's a UNESCO rep of RP isn't he?) UNESCO, Philosophy Division. I had been studying philosophy for 15 years now and when I first heard about it a month go the concept of celebrating it was totally new to me. Geez. All this time, UNESCO has had a philo division? They even sponsored lectures by JP Sartre many decades ago, this I learned from a printout of an old events brochure. Wow! We never had such celebrations in the past and if my boss is correct, this is also the first time that Philo Day is marked as an “event” in this country, and only the third time all around the globe.
I am making a huge deal of it because let’s face it, I honestly don’t know a lot of people outside of the campus walls who would admit to loving the discipline, much less claiming to “know” what it is that preoccupies “philosophers” – the Filipino understanding of “pilosopo” or “pilosopa” (to be absolutely PC) just doesn’t cut it. Neither does the more intellectual sounding “pantas mahal.” Philosophers get a lot of flak for being a contumacious bunch of nitpicky parsers, obscurantists all—making not-so fine ontological distinctions between “
Being” and “
being” (note the
big B and the
small b), i.e., the
Dasein and the
Das Man. So much for Heideggerian metaphysics.
Hedeggerrrr talaga!
I’d like to think however that today’s line up of activities made quite an impact on the students. Our philo undergrad majors held a Philo contest [three rounds: quiz format, (objective type and content based), essay writing, and for the finals round, an on the spot orals on philosophical issues] they initially dubbed the
Philosopher-King’s Cup (after Plato’s ideal ruler, of course). They had to drop the “King” because the rabid feminist faculty-PC police (ahem) objected to the royal title. ‘Twas a great thing too because the champion was not a King but a “Queen” – a Philosophress won 3K in cash, and her name (as the very first champ) will be engraved in a shiny new silver cup that closely resembles the Wimbledon trophy.
To raise funds the students had the caricature of
Nietzsche printed on nifty white shirts and they sold like hotcakes. I was disappointed that they picked Nietzsche. I mean yeah, he had a remarkable moustache, and a distinct profile but why him? I was telling Gab that
Socrates could’ve made a more interesting figure, stubby nose, high forehead, long white beard, the baldy geezer had more character. Or what about
Ayn Rand (ok, technically “not” a philosopher but very interesting face), and Dame
Simone de Beauvoir? Or
Jean Paul Sartre the cross-eyed existentialist Frenchie? Hmmm… now profiteering from these very people whose works constantly give us headaches is beginning to sound promising. After all we in the philosophy department do not expect to get rich via our usual “trade” being so high up in the ivory tower so might as well milk them for all they’re worth eh? Ha!
Then there was also an exhibit,
The Dead White Male Philosophers Gallery where portraits of philosophers were showcased. The title of the exhibit was a joke, I submitted it to make a point, but hey I never expected them to keep the tilte. They actually thought it was cool, argh! However now I am more ambivalent. I hate it when I’m the only one who’s laughing! :-(